Comments on: Two months later: Project Wonderful. http://pxnet.pixelechoes.net/2007/03/05/two-months-later-project-wonderful/ If our world was... just like a human, would we abuse it so? Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:44:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Xial Lunashine http://pxnet.pixelechoes.net/2007/03/05/two-months-later-project-wonderful/comment-page-1/#comment-23442 Xial Lunashine Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:27:05 +0000 http://pxnet.pixelechoes.net/2007/03/05/project-wonderful-is-not-valid-xhtml/#comment-23442 <a href="#comment-23441">>>1</a> Well, I actually did email them about it. According to them, they are at least XHTML 1.0 Transitional compliant, but I let them know that unless I lower my doctype to match (which I did, because there's just too much crap out there that isn't strict, and I'd be up to my elbows in email, trying to get everyone else to actually catch up to Strict. They asked me to try the revised code (which they seem to have rolled out in the two months since I joined), and though it is a little better (and validates as XHTML 1.0 Transitional), I wish it were XHTML 1.0 Strict. ;) I'll probably add another ad box back, so I can at least have two slots here, but it's not so bad now. :) >>1

Well, I actually did email them about it.

According to them, they are at least XHTML 1.0 Transitional compliant, but I let them know that unless I lower my doctype to match (which I did, because there’s just too much crap out there that isn’t strict, and I’d be up to my elbows in email, trying to get everyone else to actually catch up to Strict.

They asked me to try the revised code (which they seem to have rolled out in the two months since I joined), and though it is a little better (and validates as XHTML 1.0 Transitional), I wish it were XHTML 1.0 Strict. ;)

I’ll probably add another ad box back, so I can at least have two slots here, but it’s not so bad now. :)

]]> By: ak-ryuu http://pxnet.pixelechoes.net/2007/03/05/two-months-later-project-wonderful/comment-page-1/#comment-23441 ak-ryuu Mon, 12 Mar 2007 02:21:22 +0000 http://pxnet.pixelechoes.net/2007/03/05/project-wonderful-is-not-valid-xhtml/#comment-23441 The lack of respect for web standards is exactly one of the reasons why I don't want PW ads on my main page (I have them in the archive, but it annoys me all the time that I can't validate my site, which is otherwise XHTML Strict). I should possibly write to PW and complain to them about this -- maybe they are able to fix it, after all. I'm just not really good at writing such mails ... The best thing about PW for me (besides being able to advertise my web site for little money) is finding sites that I otherwise wouldn't have found -- I, too, have started reading some webcomics and blogs that I found only because they advertised on my site :) The lack of respect for web standards is exactly one of the reasons why I don’t want PW ads on my main page (I have them in the archive, but it annoys me all the time that I can’t validate my site, which is otherwise XHTML Strict). I should possibly write to PW and complain to them about this — maybe they are able to fix it, after all. I’m just not really good at writing such mails …

The best thing about PW for me (besides being able to advertise my web site for little money) is finding sites that I otherwise wouldn’t have found — I, too, have started reading some webcomics and blogs that I found only because they advertised on my site :)

]]>